최신자료
Beyond paper reforms: Building coalitions for democracy in the DRC
- The Democratic Republic of the Congo has been through three major waves of democratization, each fueled by a different combination of massive grassroots mobilization, elite maneuvering, and foreign involvement. Each time, the result has been bold reforms followed by gradual retrenchment as the institutions delineated on paper are diluted and co-opted by the ruling elites.
- What emerges is a sobering picture in which the very necessary technical debates over institutional design-what kind of electoral system, the nature of parliamentary power, the right to a free press and popular assembly-take a backseat to political power struggles.
- This is the rationale for the approach taken in this paper. Drawing on past experiences, we highlight the technical reforms necessary at the current moment. This includes checks on presidential power, greater transparency in parliamentary proceedings, reforms to the electoral system, more accountability for security forces, and more space for participatory democracy. At the same time, however, we also highlight the fact, borne out by history, that even the best reforms on paper will not become reality unless there is a political movement to back them. As long politics remains a game controlled by a narrow elite, there is little hope for broad transformation.
- This analysis draws on political settlement theory (Khan 2005, 2010) and political mediation theory (Amenta et al. 2010). Both schools of scholarship share the attention to the balance of power between contending groups and classes in society. While we outline a technical reform package here, without a powerful political coalition, these transformations will remain elusive. The deepest challenge to the construction of that coalition in the DRC is not only government repression, but the persistence of patron-client relations, alongside the institutional weakness of political parties, media, and civil society organizations (Diamond 1997).
- In the first sections, we summarize how reform coalitions have come together in the past, highlighting their disparate nature and the links between grassroots organizing and elite politics. The following portion of the paper is dedicated to recommended technical democratic reforms, including limiting presidential power, strengthening political parties, carrying electoral reforms, and bolstering a strong and accountable civil society. We end by returning to the need of building reform coalitions and laying out how this might happen.
- What emerges is a sobering picture in which the very necessary technical debates over institutional design-what kind of electoral system, the nature of parliamentary power, the right to a free press and popular assembly-take a backseat to political power struggles.
- This is the rationale for the approach taken in this paper. Drawing on past experiences, we highlight the technical reforms necessary at the current moment. This includes checks on presidential power, greater transparency in parliamentary proceedings, reforms to the electoral system, more accountability for security forces, and more space for participatory democracy. At the same time, however, we also highlight the fact, borne out by history, that even the best reforms on paper will not become reality unless there is a political movement to back them. As long politics remains a game controlled by a narrow elite, there is little hope for broad transformation.
- This analysis draws on political settlement theory (Khan 2005, 2010) and political mediation theory (Amenta et al. 2010). Both schools of scholarship share the attention to the balance of power between contending groups and classes in society. While we outline a technical reform package here, without a powerful political coalition, these transformations will remain elusive. The deepest challenge to the construction of that coalition in the DRC is not only government repression, but the persistence of patron-client relations, alongside the institutional weakness of political parties, media, and civil society organizations (Diamond 1997).
- In the first sections, we summarize how reform coalitions have come together in the past, highlighting their disparate nature and the links between grassroots organizing and elite politics. The following portion of the paper is dedicated to recommended technical democratic reforms, including limiting presidential power, strengthening political parties, carrying electoral reforms, and bolstering a strong and accountable civil society. We end by returning to the need of building reform coalitions and laying out how this might happen.
많이 본 자료
