최신자료
Preferences for Warning Signal Quality: Experimental Evidence
We use a laboratory experiment to study preferences over false-positive and false-negative rates of warning signals for an adverse event with a known prior. We find that subjects decrease their demand with signal quality, but less than predicted by our theory. There is asymmetric under-responsiveness by prior: for a low (high) prior, their willingness-to-pay does not fully adjust for the increase in the false-positive (false-negative) costs. We show that neither risk preference nor Bayesian updating skills can fully explain our results. Our results are most consistent with a decision-making heuristic in which subjects do not distinguish between false-positive and false-negative errors.
많이 본 자료
![[2025.07] 대출규제](/userdata/main/incContent/sideLink/23/aaaqQGcnBTcOc8zW9uLNz20251015165742zqfnw.png)
![[사람이 되고 싶어요2] 환율의 변화](/userdata/main/incContent/sideLink/22/aaaqQGcnBTcOc8zW9uLNz20251015165408vtzoa.jpg)
